| Pages: [1] |
1. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You guys are screwed. Technical evaluation.
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.10 15:31:00
|
2. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: After we shut down all their mission systems, they're screwed. No LP from missions. No LP from plexes. They get to go grind L4's in high sec. Not all FW agents are in lowsec...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.08 00:26:00
|
3. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Deen Wispa wrote: People should take this poll that Susan has set up. I'd like to see more quantifiable numbers rather than heresy Yea, because a website poll is scientifically valid and provides a representative data set from which to draw ...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 23:16:00
|
4. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Almity wrote: My last point on the docking issue is this. I'm flashy. I can't dock in high sec(in a ship). I can't dock in enemy controlled space. In the Amarr/Minnie war zone I have one choice. That's right. In a 7 jump radius of Kourm I can d...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 22:21:00
|
5. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You know, if there were less "the sky is falling" sensationalism on the part of current fw players people might actually listen to what you have to say. Of course, it would involve toning down your estimates of the effects of this 'apocalypse'. R...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 22:19:00
|
6. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Shalee Lianne wrote: Because it looks like you're trolling. :) Saying thus does not make it so.
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 05:17:00
|
7. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Shalee Lianne wrote: Amarrian Slavetrader, it would be much more productive to post your insight on your main character instead of a trolling alt. Don't blame militia for being 'pirate'. Do we have some? Sure. But some of us wouldn't be negati...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 05:05:00
|
8. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jimmy Nickson wrote: [quote=Amarrian Slavetrader]Have my cake and eat it to, wtf I'll just get more cake and eat it, CAKE FOR ALL! lol, but srsly what you just said makes no sense, the hole point of having cake is to eat it Fascinating.
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 04:49:00
|
9. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jimmy Nickson wrote: I'm fine with not going to high-sec because I'm pirate thats fine, but locking me out of station because I'm on the loosing side, I'm not gonna go rat in null-sec for 5 day straight, only to come back and make it go down to...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 04:44:00
|
10. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Jimmy Nickson wrote: Problem, atleast half amarr miltia is -5 or below. And that's supposed to be the fault of the game designers? So as I understand it then, the people whining have made a choice to go -5 by killing non-wts and now don't w...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 04:38:00
|
11. More FW changes on SiSi - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I'm confused as to why people think it'll make such a big difference. Years ago the public amarr fleets staged out of Tuomuta (in highsec). Nothing here will stop anyone from basing out of highsec and that's a worst case scenario. This may actual...
- by Amarrian Slavetrader - at 2012.05.07 04:21:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |